[PATCH v2 3/9] d3d9/tests: Add more visibility tests.

[Gabriel Ivăncescu]

For some reason, it looks like the behavior is swapped for Win8 and 
above. Should I use broken() or what's the best way to handle this?

On 06/07/2020 18:39, Marvin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> While running your changed tests, I think I found new failures.
> Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
> wrong, but could you please double-check?
> 
> Full results can be found at:
> https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=74867
> 
> Your paranoid android.
> 
> 
> === w8 (32 bit report) ===
> 
> d3d9:
> device.c:5029: Test failed: Expected device window extended style 0x108, got 0x100, i=1.
> device.c:5051: Test failed: Expected device window extended style 0x100, got 0x108, i=1.
> 
> === w8adm (32 bit report) ===
> 
> d3d9:
> device.c:5029: Test failed: Expected device window extended style 0x108, got 0x100, i=1.
> device.c:5051: Test failed: Expected device window extended style 0x100, got 0x108, i=1.
> 
> === w1064v1507 (32 bit report) ===
> 
> d3d9:
> device.c:5029: Test failed: Expected device window extended style 0x108, got 0x100, i=1.
> device.c:5051: Test failed: Expected device window extended style 0x100, got 0x108, i=1.
> 
> === w1064v1809 (32 bit report) ===
> 
> d3d9:
> device.c:5029: Test failed: Expected device window extended style 0x108, got 0x100, i=1.
> device.c:5051: Test failed: Expected device window extended style 0x100, got 0x108, i=1.
> 
> === w1064v1809_2scr (32 bit report) ===
> 
> d3d9:
> device.c:5029: Test failed: Expected device window extended style 0x108, got 0x100, i=1.
> device.c:5051: Test failed: Expected device window extended style 0x100, got 0x108, i=1.
> 
> === w1064v1809_ar (32 bit report) ===
> 
> d3d9:
> device.c:5029: Test failed: Expected device window extended style 0x108, got 0x100, i=1.
> device.c:5051: Test failed: Expected device window extended style 0x100, got 0x108, i=1.
> 
> === w1064v1809_he (32 bit report) ===
> 
> d3d9:
> device.c:5029: Test failed: Expected device window extended style 0x108, got 0x100, i=1.
> device.c:5051: Test failed: Expected device window extended style 0x100, got 0x108, i=1.
> 
> === w1064v1809_ja (32 bit report) ===
> 
> d3d9:
> device.c:5029: Test failed: Expected device window extended style 0x108, got 0x100, i=1.
> device.c:5051: Test failed: Expected device window extended style 0x100, got 0x108, i=1.
> 
> === w1064v1809_zh_CN (32 bit report) ===
> 
> d3d9:
> device.c:5029: Test failed: Expected device window extended style 0x108, got 0x100, i=1.
> device.c:5051: Test failed: Expected device window extended style 0x100, got 0x108, i=1.
> 
> === w864 (64 bit report) ===
> 
> d3d9:
> device.c:5029: Test failed: Expected device window extended style 0x108, got 0x100, i=1.
> device.c:5051: Test failed: Expected device window extended style 0x100, got 0x108, i=1.
> 
> === w1064v1507 (64 bit report) ===
> 
> d3d9:
> device.c:5029: Test failed: Expected device window extended style 0x108, got 0x100, i=1.
> device.c:5051: Test failed: Expected device window extended style 0x100, got 0x108, i=1.
> 
> === w1064v1809 (64 bit report) ===
> 
> d3d9:
> device.c:5029: Test failed: Expected device window extended style 0x108, got 0x100, i=1.
> device.c:5051: Test failed: Expected device window extended style 0x100, got 0x108, i=1.
> 
> === debiant (32 bit report) ===
> 
> d3d9:
> device: Timeout
> 
> === debiant (build log) ===
> 
> 0024:err:winediag:nodrv_CreateWindow Application tried to create a window, but no driver could be loaded.
> 0024:err:winediag:nodrv_CreateWindow The explorer process failed to start.
> Task: WineTest did not produce the win32_fr_FR report
> 
> === debiant (32 bit WoW report) ===
> 
> d3d9:
> device: Timeout
> 
> === debiant (build log) ===
> 
> 0024:err:winediag:nodrv_CreateWindow Application tried to create a window, but no driver could be loaded.
> 0024:err:winediag:nodrv_CreateWindow The explorer process failed to start.
> Task: WineTest did not produce the wow64 report
>