[PATCH 2/2] gdiplus: Allow setting rasterization limit only during recording.
Marvin
testbot at winehq.org
Thu May 14 22:04:14 CDT 2020
Hi,
While running your changed tests, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at:
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=71789
Your paranoid android.
=== wxppro (32 bit report) ===
gdiplus:
metafile.c:449: Test failed: Expected 00000008, got 00000002
=== w2008s64 (32 bit report) ===
gdiplus:
metafile.c:449: Test failed: Expected 00000008, got 00000002
=== w8 (32 bit report) ===
gdiplus:
metafile.c:449: Test failed: Expected 00000008, got 00000002
=== w8adm (32 bit report) ===
gdiplus:
metafile.c:449: Test failed: Expected 00000008, got 00000002
=== w1064v1507 (32 bit report) ===
gdiplus:
metafile.c:449: Test failed: Expected 00000008, got 00000002
=== w1064v1809 (32 bit report) ===
gdiplus:
metafile.c:449: Test failed: Expected 00000008, got 00000002
=== w1064v1809_2scr (32 bit report) ===
gdiplus:
metafile.c:449: Test failed: Expected 00000008, got 00000002
=== w1064v1809_ar (32 bit report) ===
gdiplus:
metafile.c:449: Test failed: Expected 00000008, got 00000002
=== w1064v1809_he (32 bit report) ===
gdiplus:
metafile.c:449: Test failed: Expected 00000008, got 00000002
=== w1064v1809_ja (32 bit report) ===
gdiplus:
metafile.c:449: Test failed: Expected 00000008, got 00000002
=== w1064v1809_zh_CN (32 bit report) ===
gdiplus:
metafile.c:449: Test failed: Expected 00000008, got 00000002
=== w2008s64 (64 bit report) ===
gdiplus:
metafile.c:449: Test failed: Expected 00000008, got 00000002
=== w864 (64 bit report) ===
gdiplus:
metafile.c:449: Test failed: Expected 00000008, got 00000002
=== w1064v1507 (64 bit report) ===
gdiplus:
metafile.c:449: Test failed: Expected 00000008, got 00000002
=== w1064v1809 (64 bit report) ===
gdiplus:
metafile.c:449: Test failed: Expected 00000008, got 00000002
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list