[PATCH v2] ucrtbase: Extend the printf tests even further

[Martin Storsjö]

On Tue, 19 May 2020, Marvin wrote:

> Hi,
>
> While running your changed tests, I think I found new failures.
> Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
> wrong, but could you please double-check?
>
> Full results can be found at:
> https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=71986
>
> Your paranoid android.
>
>
> === debiant (32 bit report) ===
>
> ucrtbase:
> printf.c:135: Test failed: "short": expected -1, returned -2
> printf.c:135: Test failed: "justfit": expected -1, returned -2
> printf.c:135: Test failed: "justfits": expected -1, returned -2
> printf.c:135: Test failed: "muchlonger": expected -1, returned -2
> printf.c:135: Test failed: "": expected -1, returned -2
> printf.c:135: Test failed: "1": expected -1, returned -2

I can't reproduce this; the test relies on the ucrtbase printf patch that 
was pushed just before posting this patch.

// Martin