RFC Bug 49208

[Paul Gofman]

On 5/25/20 21:32, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
>
>
>> Am 25.05.2020 um 20:09 schrieb Paul Gofman <pgofman at codeweavers.com
>> <mailto:pgofman at codeweavers.com>>:
>>
>> goes in the lower
>> address space, so a bit later an .exe without relocations cannot be
>> mapped to 0x40000.
>
> It's been a while since I understood the library load code well enough
> (if I ever understood it), but shouldn't we map the .exe file before
> we map kernelbase.dll? How does ntdll figure out kernelbase is needed
> without looking into the .exe import section?
>
I think we want kernelbase and kernel32 at their fixed addresses
regardless, some DRMs or just too much inventive applications may depend
on that.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20200525/3b1179a7/attachment.htm>