RFC Bug 49208

[Paul Gofman]

On 5/25/20 21:59, Zebediah Figura wrote:
> I don't think the addresses are based on Windows addresses, though, but
> rather seem to be specifically to accommodate this kind of bug. See
> 8f567028123c and 8f7d88c707b8, the latter of which is linked to bug
> 48417. In particular I think comment 5 of that bug is relevant here.
>
But do we need those debug sections which get stripped by 'strip' loaded
every time?