RFC Bug 49208

[Paul Gofman]

On 5/25/20 21:59, Zebediah Figura wrote:
> On 5/25/20 1:39 PM, Paul Gofman wrote:
>>
> I don't think the addresses are based on Windows addresses, though, but
> rather seem to be specifically to accommodate this kind of bug. 
Yes, indeed, the address on Windows is different. But should not at
least ntdll and kernel32 still have the same address between all the
processes on Windows?