[PATCH 2/2] wdscore: Add CurrentIP stub.

[Mohamad Al-Jaf]

Whoops, I was simultaneously thinking of "in every respect" and "in all
aspects" and mangled them together haha. I meant to say "Zebediah's method
is superior in all aspects".

On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 7:41 PM Mohamad Al-Jaf <mohamadaljaf at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Interesting discussion, but it looks like Zebediah's method is superior in
> all respects.
>
> I can confirm that CurrentIP takes 0 arguments. I also tested her method
> with other, documented functions, that I know the argument counts of and it
> works perfectly.
>
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 1:31 PM Zebediah Figura (she/her) <
> zfigura at codeweavers.com> wrote:
>
>> On 12/28/21 12:24, Saulius Krasuckas wrote:
>> > On 2021-12-28 18:22, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>> >> Saulius Krasuckas <saulius2 at ar-fi.lt> writes:
>> >>
>> >>> By looking at the disassembled calling points of the function and its'
>> >>> epilogues [1] _and_ by avoiding to memorize what does core of the
>> >>> function do (particularly which other WinAPI functions does it call),
>> >>> you stay safe and in compliance with copyrights and other stuff of
>> >>> Intellectual Property law.
>> >>
>> >> No, you should never look at a disassembly of a Windows dll, period.
>> >>
>> >> Please read https://wiki.winehq.org/Clean_Room_Guidelines for details.
>> >
>> > Alexandre, I have read it before my answer and I found it to be
>> > contradicting other documentation page.  So I had to interpret this
>> > contradiction.
>> >
>> > Do you and other folks agree that part of the documentation is
>> > misleading or even incorrect in that regard?
>>
>> It doesn't seem clear to me whether that page advises disassembling the
>> function or its caller, but since it's ambiguous (and not particularly
>> helpful) I've just removed the entire section.
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20211229/fa5b44e6/attachment.htm>