[PATCH] ntdll/tests: Improve the RtlWaitOnAddress() timeout checks.

Francois Gouget fgouget at codeweavers.com
Mon Jul 5 11:10:39 CDT 2021


GetTickCount()'s granularity represents 15% of the time we want to
mesure, making it hard to not get failures. So use NtQuerySystemTime()
instead since we already depend on it.
Narrow down the acceptable range again.

Signed-off-by: Francois Gouget <fgouget at codeweavers.com>
---
We still got a couple of failures after the acceptable elapsed time
range was widened in an attempt to account for GetTickCount()'s
granularity:
https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#ntdll:om
om.c:2322: Test failed: got 78
om.c:2307: Test failed: got 62

With this patch I did not get any failures in thousands of runs but it
was already really hard to reproduce (<1%) so it's not a 100% guarantee 
that it will work now.
---
 dlls/ntdll/tests/om.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/dlls/ntdll/tests/om.c b/dlls/ntdll/tests/om.c
index 82f8188d176..81be7de00f6 100644
--- a/dlls/ntdll/tests/om.c
+++ b/dlls/ntdll/tests/om.c
@@ -2266,10 +2266,10 @@ static void test_semaphore(void)
 
 static void test_wait_on_address(void)
 {
-    DWORD ticks;
     SIZE_T size;
     NTSTATUS status;
-    LARGE_INTEGER timeout;
+    LARGE_INTEGER start, end, timeout;
+    DWORD elapsed;
     LONG64 address, compare;
 
     if (!pRtlWaitOnAddress)
@@ -2298,13 +2298,13 @@ static void test_wait_on_address(void)
     /* values match */
     address = 0;
     compare = 0;
-    pNtQuerySystemTime(&timeout);
-    timeout.QuadPart += 100*10000;
-    ticks = GetTickCount();
+    pNtQuerySystemTime(&start);
+    timeout.QuadPart = start.QuadPart + 100 * 10000;
     status = pRtlWaitOnAddress(&address, &compare, 8, &timeout);
-    ticks = GetTickCount() - ticks;
+    pNtQuerySystemTime(&end);
     ok(status == STATUS_TIMEOUT, "got 0x%08x\n", status);
-    ok(ticks >= 80 && ticks <= 1000, "got %u\n", ticks);
+    elapsed = (end.QuadPart - start.QuadPart) / 10000;
+    ok(90 <= elapsed && elapsed <= 900, "timed out in %u ms\n", elapsed);
     ok(address == 0, "got %s\n", wine_dbgstr_longlong(address));
     ok(compare == 0, "got %s\n", wine_dbgstr_longlong(compare));
 
@@ -2314,12 +2314,13 @@ static void test_wait_on_address(void)
         compare = ~0;
         compare <<= size * 8;
 
+        pNtQuerySystemTime(&start);
         timeout.QuadPart = -100 * 10000;
-        ticks = GetTickCount();
         status = pRtlWaitOnAddress(&address, &compare, size, &timeout);
-        ticks = GetTickCount() - ticks;
+        pNtQuerySystemTime(&end);
         ok(status == STATUS_TIMEOUT, "got 0x%08x\n", status);
-        ok(ticks >= 80 && ticks <= 1000, "got %u\n", ticks);
+        elapsed = (end.QuadPart - start.QuadPart) / 10000;
+        ok(90 <= elapsed && elapsed <= 900, "timed out in %u ms\n", elapsed);
 
         status = pRtlWaitOnAddress(&address, &compare, size << 1, &timeout);
         ok(!status, "got 0x%08x\n", status);
-- 
2.20.1



More information about the wine-devel mailing list