RFC: Bugzilla keyword definitions
fgouget at codeweavers.com
Mon Jul 19 08:37:29 CDT 2021
On Mon, 19 Jul 2021, Gijs Vermeulen wrote:
> Op ma 19 jul. 2021 om 14:31 schreef Francois Gouget <fgouget at codeweavers.com
> > I'm leaning towards the former in which case the definition could be
> > amended as such:
> > | Bugs with this keyword contain an attachment with a proposed fix.
> IMO a wine-devel or source.winhq.org/patches/data link should suffice.
The issue is dead links.
In particular, if I'm not mistaken, the expire script  removes
patches from the source.winehq.org/patches site after at most 30 days
 which I think is too short for Bugzilla.
Links to mailing list archives should be more durable. Maybe enough for
them to be acceptable.
 Yet some patches defy the odds like 62608 which dates back to 2010!
But it's an exception: the next oldest is 62707 which means the 99
intermediate patches were less lucky (then it's 62727, 62752, 62881,
62943, ... it's quite random).
Francois Gouget <fgouget at codeweavers.com>
More information about the wine-devel