[PATCH 3/4] quartz/tests: Check that system clock measurements are in sequence instead of comparing absolute time.

[Zebediah Figura (she/her)]

On 7/22/21 1:59 PM, Francois Gouget wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jul 2021, Marvin wrote:
> [...]
>> === w1064v1809 (32 bit report) ===
>>
>> quartz:
>> systemclock.c:191: Test failed: Got timestamps 660270000, 660310000, 660270000.
>>
>> === w1064 (32 bit report) ===
>>
>> quartz:
>> systemclock.c:191: Test failed: Got timestamps 601610000, 601560000, 601610000.
> 
> It looks like this does fail on about every Windows version, VM or not:
> 
> https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#quartz:systemclock
> 
> I guess you're already looking into it?
> 

Yep, it's already on my list.