[PATCH 5/6] hidclass.sys: Support parsing of explicit usage page.

[Rémi Bernon]

On 6/18/21 9:55 AM, Marvin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> While running your changed tests, I think I found new failures.
> Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
> wrong, but could you please double-check?
> 
> Full results can be found at:
> https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=92735
> 
> Your paranoid android.
> 
> 
> === debiant2 (32 bit report) ===
> 
> ntoskrnl.exe:
> ntoskrnl.c:2030: Test failed: report 0: value_caps[0]: got Range.UsageMax 0000, expected 0031
> ntoskrnl.c:2030: Test failed: report 1: value_caps[0]: got Range.UsageMax 0000, expected 0031
> 
> === debiant2 (32 bit Arabic:Egypt report) ===
> 
> ntoskrnl.exe:
> ntoskrnl.c:2030: Test failed: report 0: value_caps[0]: got Range.UsageMax 0000, expected 0031
> ntoskrnl.c:2030: Test failed: report 1: value_caps[0]: got Range.UsageMax 0000, expected 0031
> 
> === debiant2 (32 bit French report) ===
> 
> ntoskrnl.exe:
> ntoskrnl.c:2030: Test failed: report 0: value_caps[0]: got Range.UsageMax 0000, expected 0031
> ntoskrnl.c:2030: Test failed: report 1: value_caps[0]: got Range.UsageMax 0000, expected 0031
> 
> === debiant2 (32 bit Hebrew:Israel report) ===
> 
> ntoskrnl.exe:
> ntoskrnl.c:2030: Test failed: report 0: value_caps[0]: got Range.UsageMax 0000, expected 0031
> ntoskrnl.c:2030: Test failed: report 1: value_caps[0]: got Range.UsageMax 0000, expected 0031
> 
> === debiant2 (32 bit Japanese:Japan report) ===
> 
> ntoskrnl.exe:
> ntoskrnl.c:2030: Test failed: report 0: value_caps[0]: got Range.UsageMax 0000, expected 0031
> ntoskrnl.c:2030: Test failed: report 1: value_caps[0]: got Range.UsageMax 0000, expected 0031
> 
> === debiant2 (32 bit Chinese:China report) ===
> 
> ntoskrnl.exe:
> ntoskrnl.c:2030: Test failed: report 0: value_caps[0]: got Range.UsageMax 0000, expected 0031
> ntoskrnl.c:2030: Test failed: report 1: value_caps[0]: got Range.UsageMax 0000, expected 0031
> 

Sorry, please ignore the last two patches, I'll resend them with the 
next batch.

I moved this one early in the series and I think I had some missing 
todo_wine change at some point, but either I put it in the wrong place 
or it was only when combined with a later patch.
-- 
Rémi Bernon <rbernon at codeweavers.com>