[PATCH v2] ntdll: Implement JobObjectBasicProcessIdList for NtQueryInformationJobObject.

Gabriel Ivăncescu gabrielopcode at gmail.com
Wed Jun 23 07:49:12 CDT 2021


Hi Paul,

On 22/06/2021 21:14, Paul Gofman wrote:
> On 6/22/21 20:00, Gabriel Ivăncescu wrote:
>>   
>> +static data_size_t query_job_pids( struct job *job, data_size_t count, data_size_t maxcount, process_id_t *pids )
>> +{
>> +    struct process *process;
>> +    struct job *j;
>> +
>> +    LIST_FOR_EACH_ENTRY( process, &job->process_list, struct process, job_entry )
>> +    {
>> +        if (process->end_time) continue;
>> +        if (count < maxcount) pids[count] = process->id;
>> +        count++;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    LIST_FOR_EACH_ENTRY( j, &job->child_job_list, struct job, parent_job_entry )
>> +        count = query_job_pids( j, count, maxcount, pids );
>> +
>> +    return count;
>> +}
>> +
> The other job enumerations (for terminating jobs and sending
> completions) do it for children first on then for parent. Do you know
> that this should not be the case for job pids? I don't know if the pid
> sort order is important for anything or consistent on Windows, but if
> not testing the order explicitly I'd suggest to enumerate in the same
> order as in the other places.
> 

Thanks for the review, you're right, it was just an oversight. I'll 
resend v3.



More information about the wine-devel mailing list