[PATCH 1/5] ntdll/tests: Fix AVX tests on processors that don't support XSAVEOPT.
Zebediah Figura (she/her)
zfigura at codeweavers.com
Thu Jun 24 10:54:25 CDT 2021
On 6/24/21 4:18 AM, Paul Gofman wrote:
> On 6/24/21 08:16, Zebediah Figura wrote:
>> - ok(!xs->Mask, "Got unexpected Mask %s.\n", wine_dbgstr_longlong(xs->Mask));
>> - /* The save area has garbage in this case, the state should be restored to INIT_STATE
>> - * without using these data. */
>> + ok(xs->Mask == (xsaveopt_enabled ? 0 : 4), "Got unexpected Mask %#I64x.\n", xs->Mask);
>> + /* The save area has garbage if xsaveopt is available.
>> + *
>> + * Clear the mask; the state should be restored to INIT_STATE without
>> + * using this data. */
>> + xs->Mask = 0;
>> memcpy(context_ymm_data, test_extended_context_spoil_data1 + 4, sizeof(M128A));
>> }
>
> Since you probably have to resend anyway due to test failures, may I
> suggest to change a comment a bit, like:
>
> /* The save area has garbage if xs->Mask is zero.
> *
> * Clear the mask: the state should be restored to INIT_STATE without
> * using context data. */
>
> Or somehow I had to read these a few times before understood how this
> makes sense. It was not immediately obvious that the second part ("clear
> the mask: ...") does not concern the garbage mentioned in the first part
> but quite the opposite: mask clear is need in the test when there was
> actually not a garbage.
>
>
I guess I was trying to separate the comment, because it's a little
confusing as-is. I'll do a better job of that...
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list