[PATCH v4 8/8] oleacc: Add tests for default edit accessible object.

[Piotr Caban]

On 9/27/21 4:44 PM, Connor McAdams wrote:
> In general, do you think this style of test is too complicated? I did it
> in hopes of making future tests for different control objects
> cleaner/more readable, but if really long test functions are preferable,
> I can do it that way. My main issue with doing long function body tests
> is that after awhile I find it hard to keep track of what is being
> tested.
I'm OK with this style of test. I'm not sure why you've got an 
impression that there's anything wrong with the way the tests are 
written. The only problem is that you're adding code that is not needed 
at this point. It would be better to add more fields to test structure 
when needed. There's nothing wrong in modifying the code when adding 
tests for other classes.

Thanks,
Piotr