[PATCH v3] windows.networking: Add stub dll.

[Rémi Bernon]

On 4/25/22 10:17, Zhiyi Zhang wrote:
> Required for Iragon: Prologue.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhiyi Zhang <zzhang at codeweavers.com>
> ---
> v3: Supersede 233210. Remove unnecessary ordinal numbers.
> 
>   configure.ac                                    | 1 +
>   dlls/windows.networking/Makefile.in             | 1 +
>   dlls/windows.networking/windows.networking.spec | 8 ++++++++
>   3 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 dlls/windows.networking/Makefile.in
>   create mode 100644 dlls/windows.networking/windows.networking.spec
> 
> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> index 75292210bc4..74c80fd7fa8 100644
> --- a/configure.ac
> +++ b/configure.ac
> @@ -3098,6 +3098,7 @@ WINE_CONFIG_MAKEFILE(dlls/windows.media.devices)
>   WINE_CONFIG_MAKEFILE(dlls/windows.media.devices/tests)
>   WINE_CONFIG_MAKEFILE(dlls/windows.media.speech)
>   WINE_CONFIG_MAKEFILE(dlls/windows.media.speech/tests)
> +WINE_CONFIG_MAKEFILE(dlls/windows.networking)
>   WINE_CONFIG_MAKEFILE(dlls/windowscodecs)
>   WINE_CONFIG_MAKEFILE(dlls/windowscodecs/tests)
>   WINE_CONFIG_MAKEFILE(dlls/windowscodecsext)
> diff --git a/dlls/windows.networking/Makefile.in b/dlls/windows.networking/Makefile.in
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..8773ecdad06
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/dlls/windows.networking/Makefile.in
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +MODULE = windows.networking.dll
> diff --git a/dlls/windows.networking/windows.networking.spec b/dlls/windows.networking/windows.networking.spec
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..f91a52e2062
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/dlls/windows.networking/windows.networking.spec
> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> +1 stub @
> +@ stub DllCanUnloadNow
> +@ stub DllGetActivationFactory
> +@ stub DllGetClassObject
> +@ stub DllMain
> +@ stub DllRegisterServer
> +@ stub DllUnregisterServer
> +@ stub SetSocketMediaStreamingMode

Hi Zhiyi,

FWIW I believe someone said this was causing Overwatch to crash when it 
tries to call SetSocketMediaStreamingMode. Maybe an actual stub would be 
better.

Cheers,
-- 
Rémi Bernon <rbernon at codeweavers.com>