[PATCH 1/2] server: Always place compiler barrier before atomic memory stores.

Jin-oh Kang jinoh.kang.kr at gmail.com
Thu Feb 10 12:06:32 CST 2022


On Fri, Feb 11, 2022, 3:03 AM Jin-oh Kang <jinoh.kang.kr at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 11, 2022, 2:50 AM Rémi Bernon <rbernon at codeweavers.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2/10/22 18:43, Rémi Bernon wrote:
>> > On 2/10/22 18:36, Jin-oh Kang wrote:
>> >>
>> >> We still support GCC 4.x (an in-support RHEL/CentOS release uses it),
>> >> so I
>> >> think we still need some wrappers around it. That and the GCC bug.
>> >>
>> >
>> > The __sync intrinsices seems to have be there since GCC 4.2, then
>> > deprecated when __atomic where introduced in GCC 4.7. What's that bug?
>> >
>>
>> Nvm I missed that part of the first patch.
>>
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81316 says the bug only
> affects the __ATOMIC_RELEASE case, but it affects __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST too on
> ARM64: https://godbolt.org/z/aTaaYaoGK
>

Which is to say, this is still a meaningful fix for non-x86 architectures.


> --
>> Rémi Bernon <rbernon at codeweavers.com>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20220211/2cebbe60/attachment.htm>


More information about the wine-devel mailing list