[PATCH 1/4] comctl32/listview: Move LVN_ODSTATECHANGED notification to function.

Angelo Haller wine-devel at szanni.org
Mon Feb 21 18:22:42 CST 2022


On 21/02/2022 11.35, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
>
>
> On 2/21/22 19:11, Angelo Haller wrote:
>> Thank you Nikolay.
>>
>> I have actually tried doing so via the `ok_sequence(sequences, 
>> PARENT_SEQ_INDEX,...` commands but
>> sadly failed as quite a few of the existing tests are still marked as 
>> wine_todo. Especially a lot of code
>> regarding select/focus/deselect which are code paths that potential 
>> tests for these patches
>> would trigger as well.
>>
>> Is there a way of masking messages as "ignore" in `ok_sequence` that 
>> I missed? I would like to mask
>> some WM_NOTIFY messages like LVN_ODCACHEHINT as this has not been 
>> implemented at all yet and
>> LVN_GETDISPINFOA which gets called in a different order to windows.
>>
>> Or would a test marked as wine_todo suffice?
>
> We have "optional" flag for that, you can find it in existing message 
> tests. If that becomes too problematic there is always an option

I saw the optional flag. I thought those were `4.7x specific` or 
specific to different windows versions?
I was looking more for a `wine_todo` flag for individual messages, 
because LVN_ODCACHEHINT is not really `optional` but rather a `wine_todo`.

Although such a flag would not solve the problem of LVN_ITEMCHANGED and 
LVN_GETDISPINFOA getting
called in inverse order in windows and wine.

> to introduce another sequence just for LVN_OD* tests, and filter 
> irrelevant notifications there, so they don't appear in test results 
> at all.
>
I'm finally grasping the workings of the different sequences.
Easiest would of course be to introduce a new sequence entirely. 
Something like `PARENT_ODSTATECHANGED_SEQ_INDEX` that filters
solely for WM_NOTIFY && LVN_ODSTATECHANGED. That is the only way I can 
think of to make the tests pass after applying these patches.

Maybe adding and testing for such a specific sequence would be 
acceptable when accompanied with a
`PARENT_SEQ_INDEX` testing sequence that is still marked as wine todo?

>>
>>
>> On 21/02/2022 04.11, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
>>> Hi, Angelo.
>>>
>>> Thank you for patches. I'll have to ask you to add some tests first, 
>>> in comctl32/tests/listview.c, to verify all changes you're making.
>>>
>>
>
>




More information about the wine-devel mailing list