False positives? - Re: TestBot job 104977 - results: [PATCH 1/8] d2d1/tests: Test StrokeContains when last segment is bezier and closes the path
Stefan Brüns
stefan.bruens at rwth-aachen.de
Fri Jan 7 10:07:17 CST 2022
On Freitag, 7. Januar 2022 09:50:08 CET you wrote:
> VM Status Failures Command
> build success
> w7u_2qxl success 0 d2d1_test.exe d2d1
> w7u_adm success 0 d2d1_test.exe d2d1
> w7u_el success 0 d2d1_test.exe d2d1
> w8 success 0 d2d1_test.exe d2d1
> w8adm success 0 d2d1_test.exe d2d1
> w864 success 0 d2d1_test.exe d2d1
> w1064v1507 success 0 d2d1_test.exe d2d1
> w1064v1809 success 0 d2d1_test.exe d2d1
> w1064 success 0 d2d1_test.exe d2d1
> w1064_tsign success 0 d2d1_test.exe d2d1
> w10pro64 success 0 d2d1_test.exe d2d1
> w864 success 0 d2d1_test64.exe d2d1
> w1064v1507 success 0 d2d1_test64.exe d2d1
> w1064v1809 success 0 d2d1_test64.exe d2d1
> w1064 success 0 d2d1_test64.exe d2d1
> w1064_2qxl success 0 d2d1_test64.exe d2d1
> w1064_tsign success 0 d2d1_test64.exe d2d1
> w10pro64 success 0 d2d1_test64.exe d2d1
> w10pro64_ar success 0 d2d1_test64.exe d2d1
> w10pro64_he success 0 d2d1_test64.exe d2d1
> w10pro64_ja success 0 d2d1_test64.exe d2d1
> w10pro64_zh_CN success 0 d2d1_test64.exe d2d1
> debian11 failed 63
> debian11 failed 16
>
> You can also see the results at:
> https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=104977
>
>
> === debian11 (32 bit report) ===
>
> d2d1:
> d2d1.c:6664: Test failed: Figure does not match.
> d2d1.c:6672: Test failed: Figure does not match.
> d2d1.c:6680: Test failed: Figure does not match.
> d2d1.c:6688: Test failed: Figure does not match.
> d2d1.c:6672: Test failed: Figure does not match.
> d2d1.c:6680: Test failed: Figure does not match.
> d2d1.c:6688: Test failed: Figure does not match.
As this patch just adds another testcase, it seems somewhat unlikely it
introduces new regressions in unrelated tests.
It seems like the my previous patch got applied (which would match the 4
regressions noted), but the patch.diff from the test bot tells something else.
Is this possible?
I had tested this against rc4 and had no new test failures. As d2d was
unchanged since rc1 this should be sufficient. Visual inspection of the
results on my machine (teached the tests to dump result and reference as PBM)
also looks good.
Unfortunately, the tests are only run with WINETEST_DEBUG=1, and the relevant
output is suppressed in the logs.
Kind regards,
Stefan
--
Stefan Brüns / Bergstraße 21 / 52062 Aachen
home: +49 241 53809034 mobile: +49 151 50412019
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20220107/260c0e62/attachment.sig>
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list