[PATCH v2 0/5] MR131: wined3d: Introduce wined3d_device_check_format_support().

[Jan Sikorski (@jsikorski)]

On Fri May 27 18:11:52 2022 +0000, **** wrote:
> Zebediah Figura replied on the mailing list:
> ```
> On 5/26/22 01:51, Chip Davis wrote:
> > From: Chip Davis <cdavis5x at gmail.com>
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chip Davis <cdavis5x at gmail.com>
> > ---
> >   dlls/wined3d/device.c     | 202 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   dlls/wined3d/wined3d.spec |   1 +
> >   include/wine/wined3d.h    |  49 +++++++++
> >   3 files changed, 252 insertions(+)
> This doesn't seem like an improvement. I think it potentially makes 
> sense to use wined3d format information (plus the feature level) to more 
> accurately match the flags Windows reports—instead of reporting exactly 
> what the backend is actually capable of—but I don't see a need to move 
> the whole implementation to wined3d, not when it means adding a lot of 
> new flags to the API, and not when d3d11 is the only direct user.
> Separately, I think changes to the flags we report should be made in a 
> much more granular fashion, one per commit. Applications can be rather 
> sensitive to these flags, and I'd rather make any regressions easily 
> bisectable.
> ```
For the record, I agree on the first point, to me it's unclear what the motivation is behind this move.

-- 
https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/131#note_1563