[PATCH v2 resend 1/6] comctl32/tests: Expand ownerdata listview tests.
Zhiyi Zhang
zzhang at codeweavers.com
Sat Jun 11 02:57:14 CDT 2022
On 6/11/22 02:33, Angelo Haller wrote:
> On 10/06/2022 03.12, Zhiyi Zhang wrote:
>>
>> On 5/26/22 04:00, Angelo Haller wrote:
>>> From: Angelo Haller <angelo at szanni.org>
>>>
>>> Add more test cases to ownderdata listviews.
>>> Check LVN_ITEMCHANGED IDs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Angelo Haller <angelo at szanni.org>
>>> ---
>>> dlls/comctl32/tests/listview.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/dlls/comctl32/tests/listview.c b/dlls/comctl32/tests/listview.c
>>> index 6ac7f53137d..78b3e3ae069 100644
>>> --- a/dlls/comctl32/tests/listview.c
>>> +++ b/dlls/comctl32/tests/listview.c
>>> @@ -255,11 +255,33 @@ static const struct message ownerdata_deselect_all_parent_seq[] = {
>>> { 0 }
>>> };
>>> -static const struct message ownerdata_multiselect_odstatechanged_seq[] = {
>>> - { WM_NOTIFY, sent|id, 0, 0, LVN_ITEMCHANGED },
>>> +static const struct message ownerdata_multiselect_select_0_to_1_seq[] = {
>>> + { WM_NOTIFY, sent|id|wparam, -1, 0, LVN_ITEMCHANGED },
>>> { WM_NOTIFY, sent|id, 0, 0, LVN_ODSTATECHANGED },
>>> - { WM_NOTIFY, sent|id, 0, 0, LVN_ITEMCHANGED },
>>> - { WM_NOTIFY, sent|id, 0, 0, LVN_ITEMCHANGED },
>>> + { WM_NOTIFY, sent|id|wparam, 0, 0, LVN_ITEMCHANGED },
>>> + { WM_NOTIFY, sent|id|wparam, 1, 0, LVN_ITEMCHANGED },
>>> + { 0 }
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static const struct message ownerdata_multiselect_select_0_to_2_seq[] = {
>>> + { WM_NOTIFY, sent|id|wparam, -1, 0, LVN_ITEMCHANGED },
>>> + { WM_NOTIFY, sent|id, 0, 0, LVN_ODSTATECHANGED },
>>> + { WM_NOTIFY, sent|id|wparam, 1, 0, LVN_ITEMCHANGED },
>>> + { WM_NOTIFY, sent|id|wparam, 2, 0, LVN_ITEMCHANGED },
>>> + { 0 }
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static const struct message ownerdata_multiselect_deselect_all_select_3_seq[] = {
>>> + { WM_NOTIFY, sent|id|wparam, -1, 0, LVN_ITEMCHANGED },
>>> + { WM_NOTIFY, sent|id|wparam, 2, 0, LVN_ITEMCHANGED },
>>> + { WM_NOTIFY, sent|id|wparam, 3, 0, LVN_ITEMCHANGED },
>>> + { 0 }
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static const struct message ownerdata_multiselect_deselect_3_select_2_seq[] = {
>>> + { WM_NOTIFY, sent|id|wparam, -1, 0, LVN_ITEMCHANGED },
>>> + { WM_NOTIFY, sent|id|wparam, 3, 0, LVN_ITEMCHANGED },
>>> + { WM_NOTIFY, sent|id|wparam, 2, 0, LVN_ITEMCHANGED },
>>> { 0 }
>>> };
>>> @@ -3575,8 +3597,8 @@ static void test_ownerdata_multiselect(void)
>>> expect(0, res);
>>> ok_sequence(sequences, PARENT_ODSTATECHANGED_SEQ_INDEX,
>>> - ownerdata_multiselect_odstatechanged_seq,
>>> - "ownerdata select multiple notification", TRUE);
>>> + ownerdata_multiselect_select_0_to_1_seq,
>>> + "ownerdata multiselect: select multiple via SHIFT", TRUE);
>>> res = SendMessageA(hwnd, WM_KEYUP, VK_DOWN, 0);
>>> expect(0, res);
>>> @@ -3592,8 +3614,8 @@ static void test_ownerdata_multiselect(void)
>>> expect(0, res);
>>> ok_sequence(sequences, PARENT_ODSTATECHANGED_SEQ_INDEX,
>>> - ownerdata_multiselect_odstatechanged_seq,
>>> - "ownerdata select multiple notification", TRUE);
>>> + ownerdata_multiselect_select_0_to_2_seq,
>>> + "ownerdata multiselect: select multiple via SHIFT+CONTROL", TRUE);
>>> res = SendMessageA(hwnd, WM_KEYUP, VK_DOWN, 0);
>>> expect(0, res);
>>> @@ -3604,6 +3626,27 @@ static void test_ownerdata_multiselect(void)
>>> res = SendMessageA(hwnd, LVM_GETSELECTEDCOUNT, 0, 0);
>>> expect(3, res);
>>> + flush_sequences(sequences, NUM_MSG_SEQUENCES);
>>> +
>>> + res = SendMessageA(hwnd, WM_KEYDOWN, VK_DOWN, 0);
>>> + expect(0, res);
>>> +
>>> + ok_sequence(sequences, PARENT_ODSTATECHANGED_SEQ_INDEX,
>>> + ownerdata_multiselect_deselect_all_select_3_seq,
>>> + "ownerdata multiselect: deselect all, select item 3", TRUE);
>>> +
>>> + res = SendMessageA(hwnd, LVM_GETSELECTEDCOUNT, 0, 0);
>>> + expect(1, res);
>> Hi Angelo,
>>
>> Thanks for looking into this. There are a few things can be improved for this series.
>>
>> Please complete the keyboard sequence by sending WM_KEYUP for VK_DOWN and
>> WM_KEYUP for VK_UP.
> I'll add the WM_KEYUP events for sure. Not sure how that slipped.
>> Also please add tests for pressing VK_UP while holding Shift after setting pressing VK_DOWN while holding Shift.
>> Same for holding both Shift and Control And add checks for NMLVODSTATECHANGE member values. For example,
>> I don't think uOldState should always be 0.
>
> Happy to add more tests for VK_UP.
>
> With regards to the uOldState: I have not found an instance where it is not 0. Which kind of makes sense, at least according to the underlying logic.
>
> Windows seems to only use LVN_ODSTATECHANGED to set a new state (selection of multiple items). For un-setting (uOldState != 0) Windows will instead send an all items changed (LVN_ITEMCHANGED = -1) signal instead. That is at least what I have observed in my testing.
I see. Please add that tests as well.
>
>>> +
>>> + flush_sequences(sequences, NUM_MSG_SEQUENCES);
>>> +
>>> + res = SendMessageA(hwnd, WM_KEYDOWN, VK_UP, 0);
>>> + expect(0, res);
>>> +
>>> + ok_sequence(sequences, PARENT_ODSTATECHANGED_SEQ_INDEX,
>>> + ownerdata_multiselect_deselect_3_select_2_seq,
>>> + "ownerdata multiselect: deselect item 3, select item 2", TRUE);
>>> +
>>> DestroyWindow(hwnd);
>>> }
>>>
>
>
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list