[PATCH] include: Add dxcore.idl.
austinenglish at gmail.com
Sat Jun 25 02:41:36 CDT 2022
On Sat, Jun 25, 2022 at 2:15 AM Stefan Dösinger <stefandoesinger at gmail.com>
> > Am 25.06.2022 um 08:47 schrieb Charles Davis <cdavis5x at gmail.com>:
> > On Sat, Jun 25, 2022 at 12:36 AM Biswapriyo Nath <nathbappai at gmail.com>
> >> Thank you for the review. I copied it from dxcore.h. I have
> >> attached the updated patch.
> >> :
> > Ah, so it is under an open-source license compatible with ours. I was
> > concerned you might have copy-pasted out of a header with a more
> > restrictive license. (Even if it were Apache, for example, that would
> > cause legal problems, because that license infamously *isn't*
> > compatible with the GPLv2.) Sorry about that.
> At very least the Microsoft Corp copyright line should be retained in this
> The dos and don'ts of writing headers have always been tricky and
Not trying to 'volunteer' you for this (I think the default person for that
is jwhite ;) ) but sounds like a great chance to discuss/clarify/document
> I think this is the first case where we have the luxury of a
> license-compatible header from Microsoft.
FYI, several things have been open sourced with compatible licenses
recently. I.e., a search on github shows 1000+ projects with MIT licenses
GPG: 267B CC1F 053F 0749 (expires 2024/02/17)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the wine-devel