[PATCH 01/20] dlls/kernel32/tests/heap.c: enable compilation with long types
Francois Gouget
fgouget at codeweavers.com
Tue Mar 8 11:27:45 CST 2022
Hi,
My understanding is that these patches are pretty much independent from
each other. If so it may help a bit to not send them as a patch series,
that is without the partX/total numbering. It could still be a thread
for the sake of the mailing list though I don't know if that's easy to
achieve.
The reason is that for patch series it has to concatenate each part with
all the preceding ones. In this case this means more and more things to
recompile and thus increasingly long tasks as it progresses through the
series.
That said, for a series like this, most of the time is spent running the
tests on Windows so it would only help a little bit. That means if not
making a patch series is not practical it's ok not to.
There's no need to resend the already sent patches of course.
Also there was a question about job priority the other day on the
mailing list. Notice that this job got a higher niceness that regular
mailing list patches: 6 instead of 5. That's because one of its tasks
had a long timeout. That mechanism still leaves a lot of room for
improvement though.
--
Francois Gouget <fgouget at codeweavers.com>
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list