ShellExecute patch
Duane Clark
dclark at akamail.com
Sun Jul 21 18:28:22 CDT 2002
Steven Edwards wrote:
> I guess there is no other way of doing this without using WinExec?
>
> + if (retval > 32) /* Found */
> + {
> + TRACE("%s/%s => %s/%s\n", lpFile, lpOperation, cmd, lpstrProtocol);
> + if (*lpstrProtocol)
> + retval = execute_from_key(lpstrProtocol, lpFile, iShowCmd, is32);
> + else
> + retval = (is32) ? WinExec(cmd, iShowCmd) : WinExec16(cmd, iShowCmd);
> + }
>
I did not actually write that part, nor most of this code. Mainly what I
did was to combine the existing routines. The only problem I was trying
to solve was that ShellExecuteEx ignored parameters from the registry.
Originally I had written a routine for handling the parameters. It was
suggested to me that much of that already existed. I had not noticed
that because the two shell execute routines were in two different source
files.
I guess I am not sure what the problem is with WinExec. Originally
ShellExecuteEx used CreateProcessA and ShellExecute used WinExec, which
simply calls CreateProcessA. I could certainly directly call
CreateProcessA if that is preferable.
More information about the wine-patches
mailing list