XML & Kernel Cousin tags in WWN

Francois Gouget fgouget at free.fr
Sat Jun 7 20:58:56 CDT 2003


I noticed that the header of the WWN XML files were inconsistent.
Some started with:

---
<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<kc>
---

others with
---
<kc version="0.1.0">
---

I assume the correct form is:
---
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<kc version="0.1.0">
---

Hence the attached patch. Let me know if I got it wrong.

I also noticed that the following file need to be run through dos2unix:

wn20010611_97.xml
wn20010621_98.xml
wn20010706_99.xml
wn20010718_100.xml
wn20010802_101.xml

Interestingly we don't have an xml file for the WWN editions from 93
to 96.


-- 
Francois Gouget         fgouget at free.fr        http://fgouget.free.fr/
 The greatest programming project of all took six days; on the seventh day the
  programmer rested. We've been trying to debug the *&^%$#@ thing ever since.
                      Moral: design before you implement.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: p20030607-wwn_xml.diff.gz
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 5049 bytes
Desc: p20030607-wwn_xml.diff.gz
Url : http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/attachments/20030607/a543ba3c/p20030607-wwn_xml.diff.obj


More information about the wine-patches mailing list