WLDAP32: link to the reentrant version of libldap
hans at it.vu.nl
Tue Dec 20 06:03:24 CST 2005
On Tuesday 20 December 2005 11:23, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> All the more reason to check for the functions we are actually
> using. If there are more library variants to check for, it won't be
Even if it's 16+ functions, as in the case of the ldap_*_ext functions?
Anyway, you decide, so here's a version checking each seperate function.
> manageable to only check for a function or two and then attempt to
> guess which other functions may or may not be defined.
On the other hand, we already do a lot of guessing based on detecting
only foo_init in library foo for example. OK, I'll shut up now.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 2475 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/attachments/20051220/1a82ac47/wldap32_69.diff
More information about the wine-patches