localspl: Add a comment, why we do not implement AddPort for XcvDataPort

[Detlef Riekenberg]

localspl: Add a comment, why we do not implement AddPort for XcvDataPort

-- 
 
By by ... Detlef

-------------- next part --------------
>From 0069026bd76338b290e4e4a5786e5b8faaefb1ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Detlef Riekenberg <wine.dev at web.de>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 23:01:48 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] localspl: Add a comment, why we do not implement AddPort for XcvDataPort
---
 dlls/localspl/localmon.c |    3 +++
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/dlls/localspl/localmon.c b/dlls/localspl/localmon.c
index c98611d..3cd0816 100644
--- a/dlls/localspl/localmon.c
+++ b/dlls/localspl/localmon.c
@@ -459,6 +459,9 @@ DWORD WINAPI localmon_XcvDataPort(HANDLE
     TRACE("(%p, %s, %p, %d, %p, %d, %p)\n", hXcv, debugstr_w(pszDataName),
           pInputData, cbInputData, pOutputData, cbOutputData, pcbOutputNeeded);
 
+    /* Native localspl.dll crash on w2k and xp, when XcvDataPort is called
+       with "AddPort" as command. We do not need to implement this */
+
     if (!lstrcmpW(pszDataName, cmd_ConfigureLPTPortCommandOKW)) {
         TRACE("InputData (%d): %s\n", cbInputData, debugstr_w( (LPWSTR) pInputData));
         res = RegCreateKeyW(HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE, WinNT_CV_WindowsW, &hroot);
-- 
1.4.1