[PATCH 03/17] widl: The implicit_handle attribute is allowed with a handle explicitly specified in the function parameters.

Robert Shearman rob at codeweavers.com
Sun Apr 20 16:15:24 CDT 2008

In that case, that handle is used instead of the implicit handle.

Fix the check for the explicit_handle attribute being specified without 
a handle being specified in the function parameters, even though issuing 
an error is wrong. (Thanks to Marcus Meissner & Coverity for spotting 
that the check didn't do what is was supposed to do.)
  tools/widl/client.c |   33 +++++++++++----------------------
  tools/widl/header.c |   19 -------------------
  tools/widl/server.c |   18 ------------------
  3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ae8bbf145001348bc77cc32f8358f142d7975700.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 4876 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/attachments/20080420/82b835f4/attachment.bin 

More information about the wine-patches mailing list