Conformance tests for SetSecurityDescriptorControl()
Paul Bryan Roberts
pbronline-wine at yahoo.co.uk
Thu Sep 25 01:24:33 CDT 2008
A long (paragraph) description of what was wrong and what is now better.
One conformance test fails on a call to SetSecuirtyDescriptorControl()
because the latter calls a stub in ntdll.dll.
However trivial the final implementation of the stubbed routine, one
failing incidental invocation in a conformance test is insufficient for
patch submission purposes.
Here is a sledge hammer of a conformance test that apparently adds 256
tests that allow a Wine implementation of the stubbed routine to:
- check two out of three parameters
- return the value one would expect it to return
- pass the original failing conformance test
THIS IS A RESEND
THIS IS AN ESSAY
I seem unable to stop my e-mail client wrapping text lines so I'm
sending the patch as an attachment.
I joined up to do regression testing on an application I need, not to
spend my spare time trying to get e-mail clients to do things they
clearly don't want to do.
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
More information about the wine-patches