Minor fix for include/bits1_5.idl
gerald at pfeifer.com
Sun Jun 28 12:00:53 CDT 2009
Strike that, I must have misread the documentation.
Only thing I am wondering is do we really need the (unsigned long) here?
If anyone has a pointer to clear documentation that would be nice; what I
found so far leaves some questions open...
On Sun, 28 Jun 2009, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> The generated file include/bits1_5.h is the same before and after this
> patch, yet somehow the original form strikes me as a bit odd at best...
> Fix prototype for GetReplyData().
> diff --git a/include/bits1_5.idl b/include/bits1_5.idl
> index 274a7de..29520e2 100644
> --- a/include/bits1_5.idl
> +++ b/include/bits1_5.idl
> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ interface IBackgroundCopyJob2 : IBackgroundCopyJob
> } BG_JOB_REPLY_PROGRESS;
> HRESULT GetReplyProgress([in, out] BG_JOB_REPLY_PROGRESS *progress);
> - HRESULT GetReplyData([out, size_is( , (unsigned long) *pLength)] byte **pBuffer,
> + HRESULT GetReplyData([out, size_is((unsigned long) *pLength)] byte **pBuffer,
> [in, out, unique] UINT64 *pLength);
> HRESULT SetReplyFileName([unique] LPCWSTR filename);
> HRESULT GetReplyFileName([out] LPWSTR *pFilename);
More information about the wine-patches