secur32/tests: remove win9x hacks
Austin English
austinenglish at gmail.com
Mon Feb 28 15:05:45 CST 2011
--
-Austin
-------------- next part --------------
diff --git a/dlls/secur32/tests/secur32.c b/dlls/secur32/tests/secur32.c
index 6a46e9b..6e67784 100644
--- a/dlls/secur32/tests/secur32.c
+++ b/dlls/secur32/tests/secur32.c
@@ -198,14 +198,12 @@ static void test_InitSecurityInterface(void)
sftA = pInitSecurityInterfaceA();
ok(sftA != NULL, "pInitSecurityInterfaceA failed\n");
ok(sftA->dwVersion == SECURITY_SUPPORT_PROVIDER_INTERFACE_VERSION, "wrong dwVersion %d in security function table\n", sftA->dwVersion);
- ok(!sftA->Reserved2 || broken(sftA->Reserved2 != NULL) /* WinME */,
+ ok(!sftA->Reserved2,
"Reserved2 should be NULL instead of %p in security function table\n",
sftA->Reserved2);
- ok(sftA->Reserved3 == sftA->EncryptMessage ||
- broken(sftA->Reserved3 != sftA->EncryptMessage) /* Win9x */,
+ ok(sftA->Reserved3 == sftA->EncryptMessage,
"Reserved3 should be equal to EncryptMessage in the security function table\n");
- ok(sftA->Reserved4 == sftA->DecryptMessage ||
- broken(sftA->Reserved4 != sftA->DecryptMessage) /* Win9x */,
+ ok(sftA->Reserved4 == sftA->DecryptMessage,
"Reserved4 should be equal to DecryptMessage in the security function table\n");
if (!pInitSecurityInterfaceW)
More information about the wine-patches
mailing list