msvcrt: Standardize on using a comparison operator to ensure we return 0 or 1.

[Francois Gouget]

---

Some places already used "!= 0" while these used "?1:0". I'm fine with 
either, I just want consistency.


 dlls/msvcrt/math.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/dlls/msvcrt/math.c b/dlls/msvcrt/math.c
index 4ec225c..6bcc2b7 100644
--- a/dlls/msvcrt/math.c
+++ b/dlls/msvcrt/math.c
@@ -1217,7 +1217,7 @@ double CDECL MSVCRT__copysign(double num, double sign)
  */
 int CDECL MSVCRT__finite(double num)
 {
-  return (isfinite(num)?1:0); /* See comment for _isnan() */
+  return isfinite(num) != 0; /* See comment for _isnan() */
 }
 
 /*********************************************************************
@@ -1246,7 +1246,7 @@ INT CDECL MSVCRT__isnan(double num)
   /* Some implementations return -1 for true(glibc), msvcrt/crtdll return 1.
    * Do the same, as the result may be used in calculations
    */
-  return isnan(num) ? 1 : 0;
+  return isnan(num) != 0;
 }
 
 /*********************************************************************
-- 
1.8.4.3