[PATCH 05/12] shell32/tests: Tweak some overly optimistic ok() messages.
Francois Gouget
fgouget at free.fr
Mon Jan 4 16:30:04 CST 2016
ShellExecute() is more likely to have failed with a different error code
than to have succeeded.
Signed-off-by: Francois Gouget <fgouget at free.fr>
---
dlls/shell32/tests/shlexec.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/shell32/tests/shlexec.c b/dlls/shell32/tests/shlexec.c
index 0423c7d..541d232 100644
--- a/dlls/shell32/tests/shlexec.c
+++ b/dlls/shell32/tests/shlexec.c
@@ -951,7 +951,7 @@ static void test_lpFile_parsed(void)
/* error should be SE_ERR_FNF, not SE_ERR_NOASSOC */
sprintf(fileA, "\"%s\\drawback_file.noassoc\" foo.shlexec", tmpdir);
rc=shell_execute(NULL, fileA, NULL, NULL);
- ok(rc == SE_ERR_FNF, "%s succeeded: rc=%lu\n", shell_call, rc);
+ ok(rc == SE_ERR_FNF, "%s returned %lu\n", shell_call, rc);
/* ""command"" not works on wine (and real win9x and w2k) */
sprintf(fileA, "\"\"%s\\simple.shlexec\"\"", tmpdir);
@@ -966,11 +966,11 @@ static void test_lpFile_parsed(void)
/* is SEE_MASK_DOENVSUBST default flag? Should only be when XP emulates 9x (XP bug or real 95 or ME behavior ?) */
rc=shell_execute(NULL, "%TMPDIR%\\simple.shlexec", NULL, NULL);
- todo_wine ok(rc == SE_ERR_FNF, "%s succeeded: rc=%lu\n", shell_call, rc);
+ todo_wine ok(rc == SE_ERR_FNF, "%s returned %lu\n", shell_call, rc);
/* quoted */
rc=shell_execute(NULL, "\"%TMPDIR%\\simple.shlexec\"", NULL, NULL);
- todo_wine ok(rc == SE_ERR_FNF, "%s succeeded: rc=%lu\n", shell_call, rc);
+ todo_wine ok(rc == SE_ERR_FNF, "%s returned %lu\n", shell_call, rc);
/* test SEE_MASK_DOENVSUBST works */
rc=shell_execute_ex(SEE_MASK_DOENVSUBST | SEE_MASK_FLAG_NO_UI,
@@ -2114,7 +2114,7 @@ static void test_exes(void)
{
rc=shell_execute(NULL, filename, params, NULL);
todo_wine {
- ok(rc==SE_ERR_NOASSOC, "%s succeeded: rc=%lu\n", shell_call, rc);
+ ok(rc==SE_ERR_NOASSOC, "%s returned %lu\n", shell_call, rc);
}
}
}
--
2.6.4
More information about the wine-patches
mailing list