rpcrt4: Spelling fixes in comments.

[Francois Gouget]

Signed-off-by: Francois Gouget <fgouget at free.fr>
---
 dlls/rpcrt4/ndr_marshall.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/dlls/rpcrt4/ndr_marshall.c b/dlls/rpcrt4/ndr_marshall.c
index 5414329edd5..ee58b60a552 100644
--- a/dlls/rpcrt4/ndr_marshall.c
+++ b/dlls/rpcrt4/ndr_marshall.c
@@ -2947,7 +2947,7 @@ static unsigned char * ComplexMarshall(PMIDL_STUB_MESSAGE pStubMsg,
       {
         /* for some reason interface pointers aren't generated as
          * RPC_FC_POINTER, but instead as RPC_FC_EMBEDDED_COMPLEX, yet
-         * they still need the derefencing treatment that pointers are
+         * they still need the dereferencing treatment that pointers are
          * given */
         if (*desc == RPC_FC_IP)
           m(pStubMsg, *(unsigned char **)pMemory, desc);
@@ -3123,7 +3123,7 @@ static unsigned char * ComplexUnmarshall(PMIDL_STUB_MESSAGE pStubMsg,
       {
         /* for some reason interface pointers aren't generated as
          * RPC_FC_POINTER, but instead as RPC_FC_EMBEDDED_COMPLEX, yet
-         * they still need the derefencing treatment that pointers are
+         * they still need the dereferencing treatment that pointers are
          * given */
         if (*desc == RPC_FC_IP)
           m(pStubMsg, (unsigned char **)pMemory, desc, FALSE);
@@ -3247,7 +3247,7 @@ static unsigned char * ComplexBufferSize(PMIDL_STUB_MESSAGE pStubMsg,
       {
         /* for some reason interface pointers aren't generated as
          * RPC_FC_POINTER, but instead as RPC_FC_EMBEDDED_COMPLEX, yet
-         * they still need the derefencing treatment that pointers are
+         * they still need the dereferencing treatment that pointers are
          * given */
         if (*desc == RPC_FC_IP)
           m(pStubMsg, *(unsigned char **)pMemory, desc);
@@ -3348,7 +3348,7 @@ static unsigned char * ComplexFree(PMIDL_STUB_MESSAGE pStubMsg,
       {
         /* for some reason interface pointers aren't generated as
          * RPC_FC_POINTER, but instead as RPC_FC_EMBEDDED_COMPLEX, yet
-         * they still need the derefencing treatment that pointers are
+         * they still need the dereferencing treatment that pointers are
          * given */
         if (*desc == RPC_FC_IP)
           m(pStubMsg, *(unsigned char **)pMemory, desc);
-- 
2.13.2