[PATCH 2/2] devenum: Implement IMoniker::IsEqual().

Andrew Eikum aeikum at codeweavers.com
Mon Mar 27 08:49:11 CDT 2017


On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 04:31:55PM +0800, Jactry Zeng wrote:
> +    res = ICreateDevEnum_CreateClassEnumerator(create_devenum, &CLSID_LegacyAmFilterCategory, &enum_moniker0, 0);
> +    ok(SUCCEEDED(res), "Cannot create enum moniker (res = %x)\n", res);
> +    res = ICreateDevEnum_CreateClassEnumerator(create_devenum, &CLSID_LegacyAmFilterCategory, &enum_moniker1, 0);
> +    ok(SUCCEEDED(res), "Cannot create enum moniker (res = %x)\n", res);
> +    if (!res)
> +    {
> +        if (!IEnumMoniker_Next(enum_moniker0, 1, &moniker0, NULL) && !IEnumMoniker_Next(enum_moniker1, 1, &moniker1, NULL))
> +        {
> +            res = IMoniker_IsEqual(moniker0, moniker1);
> +            ok(!res, "IMoniker_IsEqual should failed (res = %x)\n", res);
> +
> +            res = IMoniker_IsEqual(moniker1, moniker0);
> +            ok(!res, "IMoniker_IsEqual should failed (res = %x)\n", res);
> +
> +            IMoniker_Release(moniker0);
> +            IMoniker_Release(moniker1);
> +        }

These patches look fine to me except the ok() message is wrong on these two.

Also, I think it's easier to read code that explicitly compares against S_OK or
uses SUCCEEDED() instead of using !.

Andrew



More information about the wine-patches mailing list