buildbot status

Dan Kegel dank at kegel.com
Sun Oct 9 08:33:41 CDT 2011


On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 5:28 AM, Stefan Dösinger
<stefandoesinger at gmail.com> wrote:
> I was thinking about a system where the fast systems provide quick results and
> catch probably 99% of the broken patches, and broken systems stay behind and
> report rare breakages probably an hour or two later.

That's kind of the default situation.

> But thanks to Charles' fast Mac this isn't a concern for OSX any more.
>
> Where it might still be necessary is if we want to run the tests e.g. on ARM
> CPUs where fast hardware may not be available.

Yes, we might have to do that for ARM.

Cross-compiling might be another option to speed those up.
But maybe it's ok to have the rare systems lag behind.
- Dan



More information about the wine-tests-results mailing list