Horses for courses - why not Wine 3.11, Wine 95, Wine 98, Wine NT etc.?

Christopher Morgan cmorgan at
Thu Aug 30 10:47:37 CDT 2001

It really depends on having people that want to run 16 bit apps working to
develop wines missing/incorrect functionality.  We just need more
developers.  I've been inactive for a while myself, I should get back into


On Thu, 30 Aug 2001, Mike Whittaker wrote:

> I suppose the quality of support for the various platforms (and 16-bit apps)
> really depends on the
> standard and comprehensiveness of the application/API test suite(s) used for
> checking compatibility.
> Since I (currently) have no familiarity with Wine development, perhaps I
> should reserve further judgement until
> I have taken a look at the unit, system & regression tests !
> Regards,
> Mike.
> OffTopic:
> PS. has anyone thought of porting the Win(e) API to other architectures -
> not that I don't lurve Linux, of course !
> And then there's the old 'thin client' concept. But  - one thing at a time,
> and done properly, too!
> [OK, maybe that should be - "how many other people have thought ....." ;-]

More information about the wine-users mailing list