OT: TOP or BOTTOM posts ;-) Re: [Wine]Tracktion
wildberger at cogeco.ca
Mon Dec 20 08:43:41 CST 2004
It all boils down to a question of common sense. If a comment is made to the
subject line in general, TOP POSTING is the better way. I f the comment is
made to specific points, then INTERSPERSED POSTING is preferred. If a
comment is made to the overall context, then BOTTOM POSTING *might* be
Bottom postings are *most annoying* when responding to a longwinded text by
just saying one or two words, or a short sentence with little or no
substance. People who insist of applying fixed rules are usually laking
common sense. But as always, there are exceptions :-)
On Monday 20 December 2004 02:43 am, Fabian Cenedese wrote:
> >>Depends on who's doing the reading. I prefer mine interleaved like this!
> >It's just a different way of bottom posting, because you refer to
> > something written above.
> One of the best explanations:
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
> A: Top-posting.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
> bye Fabi
> wine-users mailing list
> wine-users at winehq.org
More information about the wine-users