No subject

Oh well, that didn't reveal much!  The pointer is not anything crazy,
and in fact its value is one that didn't crash before.  I was hoping
maybe for something obviously weird.

- Walter




On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Mark Knecht wrote:

> On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 18:08:14 -0700 (PDT), Walt Ogburn
> <reuben at ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote:
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > This is strangely reminiscent of the error that Emanuele Gissi posted
> > earlier.  What do you get if you add the following line to the beginning
> > of dlls/ntdll/critsection.c, function RtlLeaveCriticalSection?
> >
> > FIXME ("Watching for seg fault: (crit = %p)\n", crit);
> >
> > Since RtlCriticalSection is the last thing called before your seg fault,
> > printing out the value of its pointer argument might be informative.
> >
> > The patch that you hunted down seems to be a pretty significant rewrite of
> > some memory management stuff by Alexandre - it's all over my head, but
> > maybe the real problem is in graphics as you suggested.
> >
> > - Walter
> >
> Walt,
>    Thanks. I'm building it now.
>
>    Can I assume that FIXME translates into some sort of print out
> without me setting any WINEDEBUG variables? Or do I need to do
> something to get it  to print?
>
>    It's quite interesting doing this poking around. I'm a hardware
> designer by trade - PC chipsets and 1394 stuff - I don't mess with
> code at this level very often.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
> _______________________________________________
> wine-users mailing list
> wine-users at winehq.org
> http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-users
>