[Wine]Re: [Fwd: Re: Execution of WineTools with Wine version 20041201 on RedHat 9]

[Andy Allen]

Hi Duane,
Many thanks for your help - I hadn't discovered all these errata -
indeed, I thought there were no errata provided now for RH9 as it's no
longer supported (as I've discovered since I bought it!).
Best regards,
Andy

On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 18:58, Duane Clark wrote:
> Andy Allen wrote:
> > Joachim, apologies again for bothering you,
> > but after I sent the email below, I managed to link Xdialog in /usr/bin
> > to /usr/local/Winetools to get Winetools to work (I'm still getting used
> > to the 'peculiarities' of linux!). I went through the Base Setup
> > procedure as advised, and it seemed to work 'mostly OK', but I think
> > there is a problem with my glibc as you advised - a couple of things:
> > Should I be able to see the fake Windows drive
> > /home/andrew/.wine/drive_c with Nautilus?
> > Can you detect anything wrong with GLIBC from the stuff below?
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Andrew
> > 
> > Drive C: is /home/andrew/.wine/drive_c, links will be made for c
> > fake_windows
> > waiting for wineservers to exit...
> > all wineservers endet after 0 seconds...
> > /usr/bin/wineserver: relocation error: /usr/bin/wineserver: symbol
> > epoll_create, version GLIBC_2.3.2 not defined in file libc.so.6 with
> > link time reference
> > detecting Wine version... done.
> 
> This is expected with the Wine RPMs when used with RH9 without errata 
> applied. To eliminate the problem, either compile Wine against your own 
> system, or better, apply the glibc errata (along with other important 
> ones such as kernel errata).
> 
> http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh9-errata.html
> 
> _______________________________________________
> wine-users mailing list
> wine-users at winehq.org
> http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-users