[Wine] what is faster: wine20041019 or 0.9
Matthew L Reed
matty at zootal.com
Wed Nov 2 11:04:26 CST 2005
Before 0.9, the UI with Wine and certain apps was much much slower -
unusably slower in some cases, so much so that I had to revert to the older
versions of Wine. Maybe a more important questions is, what has been done to
speed up 0.9? If it is as sluggish as previous versions, then it will not be
usuable for a lot of the things I'd like to do with it. What I don't know at
this time, is if it's the fault of Wine, or issues with the apps.
Example - run eMule. It is unbearably slow. Is it eMule, or Wine?
> Hi Scott,
>
> << There is no known bug in 0.9 that would make it any slower. >>
>
> I'm asking not only because of possible bugs.
>
> I read that some things in Wine were more or less completeley
> rewritten since version 20041019. IIRC one of them was the window
> manager and there were also licensing issues regarding font anti
> aliasing which could have ended in a completely different
> implementation.
>
> Such massive code changes would IMHO always influence performance.
> So the pending question for my old pentium 233 hardware is still:
>
> Has wine become faster or slower since 20041019?
>
> Markus Winhard
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wine-users mailing list
> wine-users at winehq.org
> http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-users
More information about the wine-users
mailing list