[Wine] No hide button in 0.9.60 ?

[James McKenzie]

vitamin wrote:
> [text on git-revert and git-show | patch -p1 -R removed]
>
> They do both alter source code you are correct. However, that's the only thing my method does. What Austin suggests alters index.
>
> What "git revert" does is it creates and commits a reverse patch on top of HEAD. This something for developers to deal with. And they know where to look and what to do.
>
>   
Thank you for the explanation.  However, will the user have to grab a 
new git or can this simply be undone with the 'git-show | patch -p1' 
sequence?  This should be explained as well in a Wiki article. 
> For users it will create extra set of problems. As they can't do 'git pull' anymore - their "master" is no longer the same as "origin". And they explicitly have to remove that commit with "git reset --hard". And if you forget to do this and continue on the standard path 'git fetch; git rebase origin' you will end up with problems down the round. You still have that revert patch in your tree!
>
>   
This would seriously break the git.  I usually do a git and then branch 
into another so that I can work with the problem as defined in issue 
6254.  This eliminates not being able to pull the next update.  However, 
this does lead to a serious use of hard drive space.

Lastly, thank you for the explanation of why git-revert is bad.  This 
should be added to the git page on the Wine Wiki IMHO.

James McKenzie