[Wine] World Of Warcraft perfomance problem.

[DARKGuy .]

I have a 3.2Ghz Intel P4, 512Mb RAM, 80Gb IDE 7200rpm HD, GeForce4 Ti 4200
128Mb AGP 8X and Arch with 96xx drivers, and I get cool performance too
(private servers). About 24 fps overall, either in battlegrounds, main
cities, outdoor or instances at 1024x768 at 85Hz. I can get up to 20 fps
overall in 1280x1024 at 60Hz.

DON'T waste your money in RAM, unless you're very annoyed at sometimes
locking up in main cities or want to put the terrain distance to the max.
MMORPGs really benefit from RAM, but that isn't your main problem here.

To get the most speed outta your system, make sure you have a custom X
configuration for it. Killing everything (gdm, apache, mysql, etc)
desktop-wise and starting a plain X session will greatly improve your
performance since you can just run WoW from a terminal and have all the CPU
for you (Try that, windows!).

Also, set all the video options to the minimum, remove the shaders
(Specular, death effect & full-screen glow), AND set your video to Windowed
Mode + Maximized, and choose your DESKTOP resolution at the top-left of the
video options window. That's the lowest settings you can get.

And for the love of God and everything that's sacred to you, play on a lower
resolution!!!!! that's overkill for your current specs, considering you get
-those- FPS :/...

The first time I ran WoW was in a P3 900Mhz, onboard Intel 82815 32Mb+32Mb
expansion AGP slot and 256Mb RAM, no TBC and it was a PAIN, but playable.
When I got the GeForce card and put it on.... I was averaging 24-30 fps
under Windows at 1024x768.

I also have a laptop, 1.3Ghz AMD Athlon-M, 512Mb RAM and onboard
VIA/Unichrome Pro IGP 64Mb (that's a sh** of a graphics card when it comes
to Linux) and I can play WoW fine, almost the same speed as my desktop PC
but the difference is that the movements are jerky, but if they weren't the
speed would be the same. about 15-18 fps on that one (Windows).

If you want to spend money, get a better video card (NVIDIA if you're
planning on staying on Linux). Later on you might want to spend in RAM too,
maybe 512Mb more. The 70s who told you to get 4Gb are either spoiled kids,
or don't know what they're talking about. Yeah, 4Gb is awesome, but not
everybody has the money to get it. (At least that's a spec of a "dream
machine" for me).

Good luck :)

On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 5:57 PM, gary sheppard <rhyotte at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Soccus <wineforum-user at winehq.org> wrote:
>
> > Sorry for non-posting.
> >
> > This glxgears score was in window.
> >
> > Strange thing happend - now it's like this.
> >
> > Code:
> > 14245 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2848.905 FPS
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > My resolution is 1240x1024. 60hz
> >
> > By the way, I'm playing private WoW Server - About 400-500 max people
> > online at once, so cities are not crowded as on global servers.
> >
> > You say next 512 ram? Maybe this will help, but there is one funny
> thing.
> > Last week I have installed a WoW to my friend on his OLD computer (128
> ram,
> > older graphic card than mine and about 900mhz processor) His Windows XP
> is
> > running pretty unstable, but his WoW have about 30-40 fps. Rotlf. Game
> cuts
> > only in capital cities.
> >
> > I played on Windows Xp about 1 year earlier. Fps wasn't fantastic but it
> > was playable - I guess about 30-50 fps. Of course my WoW is always set
> on
> > the minium details.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> Well sir, i for one would like to know how this all turns out!
>
> Good gaming
> Gary
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-users/attachments/20080309/693860d1/attachment.htm
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-users/attachments/20080310/380bec94/attachment.htm