Wineconf 2007 survey

[Jeremy White]

Ah..actually, it'd be more like 35-40, if past Wineconf
attendance was any guide.  (We had 50+ when we had
the Samba guys too, but I'm not sure we'll repeat that).

And I think you'd be the one setting the date; I think
the preference is for a weekend in October
(all else being equal on or before Oct 3, as we had
one RSVPer who requested that).

Cheers,

Jeremy

Mike Hearn wrote:
> Apologies for being a noob but was there a date decided for this? I
> can certainly (try to) entertain 18 people in Zurich, and we'll have
> enough space in the old office at least.
> 
> About the video link, I don't think it'd be that distracting. It's
> pretty common to do 2-way videoconfs here and it works pretty well.
> Each side can turn their mic off easily if nobody is going to speak,
> though the noise suppression normally makes it unnecessary. But the
> timezone is the main issue.
> 
> On 5/10/07, Jeremy White <jwhite at winehq.org> wrote:
>> Jeremy Newman is going to look into putting up ad words for a
>> bit on the web site to see if that earns enough revenue to help
>> offer travel scholarships; if that doesn't work, we'll see
>> if we can figure something else out.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Jeremy
>>
>> Dan Kegel wrote:
>> > OK, I now think the satellite isn't going to work out,
>> > for various reasons.   I think we should go with
>> > Zurich, and look into travel scholarships for serious
>> > Wine developers who would come but for the expense
>> > of the flight.
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > wineconf mailing list
>> > wineconf at winehq.org
>> > http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wineconf
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wineconf mailing list
>> wineconf at winehq.org
>> http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wineconf
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> wineconf mailing list
> wineconf at winehq.org
> http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wineconf
>