wine packages for Fedora Extras

[Neal Gompa]

So, does that mean that the wine debugger is now available in extras?
Because it seems its not there, and I could find a such package that would
contain it...

On 7/4/06, Vitaliy Margolen <wine-devel at kievinfo.com> wrote:
>
> Tuesday, July 4, 2006, 12:06:00 PM, Andreas Bierfert wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > some of you might have noticed that building 0.9.16 for Fedora Extras
> took me
> > more time then the releases before. This was because of the discussions
> from a
> > couple of weeks ago on this list. As a result I did spent some time on
> the
> > mentioned issues and came across an easy solution:
>
> > If you install wine form the Fedora Extras repository via 'yum install
> wine'
> > nearly everything that would be in a monolithic package is going to be
> > installed. The 'wine' package now is a meta-package containing requires
> for
> > the various subpackages. So now 'normal' users who do a 'yum install
> wine'
> > will get everything they need and experts who know what they are doing
> can
> > go and install only the parts they want. I hope that this solution now
> leads to
> > fewer 'false positives' on bug reports and for better user integration
> and
> > satisfies some of the things you, the wine folks, brought up.
>
> > Thanks for the input on this matter. I hope that this is only the first
> step
> > towards a good relation ship between wine and the fedora packages for
> wine and
> > that emails like the ones from a couple of weeks back won't happen
> again...
>
> > So for the announcement:
>
> > wine 0.9.16 for Fedora Extras 3,4,5,devel is build and should be pushed
> to the
> > mirrors in a couple of hours.
>
> > - Andreas
>
>
> Wonderful! Thank you very much!
>
> Vitaliy.
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20060704/7c54340d/attachment-0001.htm