defining and revamping our bugzilla categories
winehacker at gmail.com
Thu Oct 11 21:36:06 CDT 2007
On 10/11/07, James Hawkins <truiken at gmail.com> wrote:
> No, because not all printing problems are gdi, and if you don't have
> gdi-printing, there's no need for gdi-video; just plain gdi works.
> The same argument goes for gdi-video. So, we should have:
> and any bugs that are marked as wine-gdi-(printing) should be set to
> one or the other.
Yes I second this motion. The components should be named as simply as
possible. Users are going to be the ones filing the reports and
whoever is doing triage is going to have to move it around if its in
the wrong area. Abstract names like DirectX, Sound, Graphics,
Installers and Printing are a much better idea than dllnames. Hell I
don't even know what shdocvw does really and when an application
starts spewing FIXME messages that have random dllnames in them we are
just going to get bad bug reports. Its much better to have abstract
categories that match behavioral issues.
"There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world, and
that is an idea whose time has come." - Victor Hugo
More information about the wine-devel