secur32: Fix a failing test in win95

[James Hawkins]

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 5:30 AM, Paul Vriens <paul.vriens.wine at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 10:06 AM, James Hawkins
> <jhawkins at codeweavers.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Changelog:
>> * Fix a failing test in win95.
>>
>>  dlls/secur32/tests/main.c |    3 ++-
>>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> James Hawkins
>>
> But if the result is SEC_E_UNSUPPORTED_FUNCTION it's not broken is it?
>

Do you think returning SEC_E_UNSUPPORTED_FUNCTION is acceptable
behavior for Wine?

> Shouldn't we use some kind of skip here? (The end result will be the
> same, as we should use win_skip, it just doesn't look correct).
>

There's really no point.

-- 
James Hawkins