secur32: Fix a failing test in win95
paul.vriens.wine at gmail.com
Wed Sep 24 06:23:45 CDT 2008
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:47 PM, James Hawkins
<jhawkins at codeweavers.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 5:30 AM, Paul Vriens <paul.vriens.wine at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 10:06 AM, James Hawkins
>> <jhawkins at codeweavers.com> wrote:
>>> * Fix a failing test in win95.
>>> dlls/secur32/tests/main.c | 3 ++-
>>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>> James Hawkins
>> But if the result is SEC_E_UNSUPPORTED_FUNCTION it's not broken is it?
> Do you think returning SEC_E_UNSUPPORTED_FUNCTION is acceptable
> behavior for Wine?
No of course not. But we tend to use broken() if we think a certain
windows platform is well uh, broken. And we use skip() if it's
More information about the wine-devel