[4/7] comctl32/updown: Show that UDS_SETBUDDYINT switching doesn't affect behaviour for already created control

[Nikolay Sivov]

Paul Vriens wrote:
> On 09/20/2009 10:02 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
>>> From 8981901ce08501229487a1fcd2d430490cb66823 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Nikolay Sivov<bunglehead at gmail.com>
>> Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 02:52:39 +0400
>> Subject: Tests to show that UDS_SETBUDDYINT switching doesn't affect 
>> behaviour for already created control
>>
>> ---
>>   dlls/comctl32/tests/updown.c |   59 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>   1 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>
> Hi Nikolay,
>
> This one (and also "[5/7] comctl32/updown: Fix control behaviour for 
> UDS_SETBUDDYINT style") add some tests that use UDM_GETPOS32 and/or 
> UDM_SETPOS32.
>
> These are only available as of 5.80.
>
> We are already skipping tests in updown because of this, but not these 
> new ones yet. Any idea about the cleanest approach?
Hi.

These could be replaced with UDM_GETPOS/UDM_SETPOS without any problems. 
Could you make a patch? I'm too busy now, sorry.