[4/7] comctl32/updown: Show that UDS_SETBUDDYINT switching doesn't affect behaviour for already created control

[Paul Vriens]

On 09/25/2009 10:27 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> Paul Vriens wrote:
>> On 09/20/2009 10:02 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
>>>> From 8981901ce08501229487a1fcd2d430490cb66823 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Nikolay Sivov<bunglehead at gmail.com>
>>> Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 02:52:39 +0400
>>> Subject: Tests to show that UDS_SETBUDDYINT switching doesn't affect
>>> behaviour for already created control
>>>
>>> ---
>>> dlls/comctl32/tests/updown.c | 59
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>> 1 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> Hi Nikolay,
>>
>> This one (and also "[5/7] comctl32/updown: Fix control behaviour for
>> UDS_SETBUDDYINT style") add some tests that use UDM_GETPOS32 and/or
>> UDM_SETPOS32.
>>
>> These are only available as of 5.80.
>>
>> We are already skipping tests in updown because of this, but not these
>> new ones yet. Any idea about the cleanest approach?
> Hi.
>
> These could be replaced with UDM_GETPOS/UDM_SETPOS without any problems.
> Could you make a patch? I'm too busy now, sorry.
>

Sure, but that will be after the weekend for me as well.

-- 
Cheers,

Paul.