winmm: waveOutReset returns all buffers.
dank at kegel.com
Tue Sep 27 11:59:39 CDT 2011
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:35 AM, <Joerg-Cyril.Hoehle at t-systems.com> wrote:
> This raises the question about when to use [PATCH X/Y] and/or whether
> buildbots should apply all precedingly submitted patches that did not fail.
> I tend to use X/Y subject lines when patches depend on each other in the
> sense that one should not apply patch #2 without #1.
> There was no such dependency here, one could commit or reject each individually.
> The only particularity about yesterday's patches is that there were 2 patches
> to the same function, waveOutReset. Trying to apply the second one without
> the first obviously needs a "fuzz", yet the second patch *can* be used stand alone.
> Luckily, AJ is much smarter than the bot, and all patches went in.
Yeah. On the other hand, he specifically requested that buildbot
be strict about not allowing fuzz. I *think* that implies he'd
prefer the X/Y notation if it's required to prevent fuzz.
More information about the wine-devel